Microsoft security patches for September 2006
Overview of the September 2006 Microsoft patches.
0 comment(s)
# | Affected | Known Problems |
Known Exploits | Microsoft rating | ISC rating (*) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
clients | servers | |||||
re-released MS06-040 | Server Service CVE-2006-3439 |
Re-released to fix known problems KB921883 |
Multiple botnets actively exploiting this. | Critical |
PATCH NOW |
PATCH NOW |
re-released MS06-042 | Internet Explorer (MSIE) CVE-2006-3280 CVE-2006-3450 CVE-2006-3451 CVE-2006-3637 CVE-2006-3638 CVE-2006-3639 CVE-2006-3640 CVE-2004-1166 CVE-2006-3869 new: CVE-2006-3873 |
Re-released to fix the known problems with MSIE6SP1 KB918899 |
Well known vulnerabilities |
Critical |
PATCH NOW |
Important |
MS06-052 | Microsoft Queue System (MSQS) - Pragmatic General Multicast (PGM) CVE-2006-3442 |
No reported problems KB919007 |
No known exploits yet |
Important |
Critical | Critical (**) |
MS06-053 | Indexing Service CVE-2006-0032 |
No reported problems KB920685 |
No known exploits yet | Moderate |
Less urgent |
Important |
MS06-054 | Publisher CVE-2006-0001 |
No reported problems KB910729 |
No known exploits yet | Critical |
Critical | Less urgent |
We will update issues on this page as they evolve.
We appreciate updates
US based customers can call Microsoft for free patch related support on 1-866-PCSAFETY
We appreciate updates
US based customers can call Microsoft for free patch related support on 1-866-PCSAFETY
(*): ISC rating
The key is that the separation between server and client is how you use the machine, we rated the MSIE issues in MS06-042 lower due to most administrators being smart enough never to surf the web on a server. Still, if you installed a windows server license on your laptop and surf the web with it, it is at high risk even if it is a "server" licensed version of the OS.
--
Swa Frantzen -- Section 66
- We use 4 levels:
- PATCH NOW: Typically used where we see immediate danger of exploitation. Typical environments will want to deploy these patches ASAP. Workarounds are typically not accepted by users or are not possible. This rating is often used when typical deployments make it vulnerable and exploits are being used or easy to obtain or make.
- Critical: Anything that needs little to become "interesting" for the dark side. Best approach is to test and deploy ASAP. Workarounds can give more time to test.
- Important: Things where more testing and other measures can help.
- Less urgent: Typically we expect the impact if left unpatched to be not that big a deal in the short term. Do not forget them however.
- The difference between the client and server rating is based on how you use the affected machine. We take into account the typical client and server deployment in the usage of the machine and the common measures people typically have in place already. Measures we presume are simple best practices for servers such as not using outlook, MSIE, word etc. to do traditional office or leaisure work.
- The rating is not a risk analysis as such. It is a rating of importance of the vulnerability and the perceived or even predicted threat for affected systems. The rating does not account for the number of affected systems there are. It is for an affected system in a typical worst-case role.
- Only the organization itself is in a position to do a full risk analysis involving the presence (or lack of) affected systems, the actually implemented measures, the impact on their operation and the value of the assets involved.
- All patches released by a vendor are important enough to have a close look if you use the affected systems. There is little incentive for vendors to publicize patches that do not have some form of risk to them.
The key is that the separation between server and client is how you use the machine, we rated the MSIE issues in MS06-042 lower due to most administrators being smart enough never to surf the web on a server. Still, if you installed a windows server license on your laptop and surf the web with it, it is at high risk even if it is a "server" licensed version of the OS.
--
Swa Frantzen -- Section 66
×
Diary Archives
Comments