Cyber Shockwave
At 8 pm EST (0100 UTC) on February 20th and 21st CNN will air a program called "Cyber Shockwave" which was filmed last Tuesday in Washington, D.C. I was invited to be in the studio audience during the taping of the program. I am frankly disappointed with the way it turned out. First, the scenario used as a backdrop is not realistic. The presumption is that a smartphone application is used to crash large portions of the nation's cellular phone system, which then leads to outages in the POTS (plain old telephone system) networks, which leads to loss of air traffic control, disruptions at the New York Stock Exchange, and massive power outages. As most of our readers know, such a cascading effect across multiple networks and systems is not likely. Not saying it's impossible, just not likely. The second issue is the fact that the people playing the role of National Security Council members failed to recognize the role of the private sector until well into the second hour. The government does not own or operate the communications infrastructure in the United States. To leave the private sector out of the conversation is a massive oversight. To be fair, the panel does recognize that the private sector has a role, but it comes after a long deliberation about how helpful the government should be.
My fear is that the average viewer will come away from this program convinced that the scenario is real (after all, why would CNN show something that is not real?) and that only the government can help lead us into a world of peaceful coexistence in cyberspace. As most (hopefully all) of our readers know, cyberspace is very complex and security comes not from just the private sector or just the government but jointly, with each party playing a very important role.
I invite you to watch the program then post your comments or thoughts below using the COMMENT feature.
ps - watch the two maps, the one of the cell phone outages and the one of the electric grid failures. The cell phone maps show "green" where there is 100% operation, including areas of the country where there is no coverage at all. The electric power map is actually a map of the highway system. Watch the highways go dark later in the simulation. I've never seen highways go dark during a power failure (unless it's at night.)
Marcus Sachs
Director, SANS Internet Storm Center
Comments
The person that is "playing" the attorney general is saying, "Hey! We can't throw the constitution out the window because of a national emergency! We cannot just seize private sector assets at a whim of the president!" The person playing the secretary of energy basically says "Well why not?!" And the National Security Adviser wants to take actions to make sure that the government has absolute power to do what ever it deems necessary in any situation no matter what!!
Are you kidding me?!
Wake up America! The people in the government are going to install themselves into a position where the citizens will have NO RIGHTS AT ALL in any type of emergency!
Grantw73
Feb 21st 2010
1 decade ago
People in the public sector had better get their rear ends in gear and prepare to defend themselves from a hostile government take over in an emergency...
These "Officials" are talking about forcing ISP's to be responsible for making sure that anyone connecting to the internet has anti virus and anti malware! This will jack the price of internet services through the roof! I don't even want to imagine what that would take to enforce!
I love all the talk about the immediate need for legislation out of everyone involved in this. They are saying the legal issues are "murky"... what is murky about the constitution?!
Grantw73
Feb 21st 2010
1 decade ago
People in the public sector had better get their rear ends in gear and prepare to defend themselves from a hostile government take over in an emergency...
These "Officials" are talking about forcing ISP's to be responsible for making sure that anyone connecting to the internet has anti virus and anti malware! This will jack the price of internet services through the roof! I don't even want to imagine what that would take to enforce!
I love all the talk about the immediate need for legislation out of everyone involved in this. They are saying the legal issues are "murky"... what is murky about the constitution?!
Grantw73
Feb 21st 2010
1 decade ago
hsb
Feb 21st 2010
1 decade ago
derpderpderp
Feb 21st 2010
1 decade ago
jt2
Feb 21st 2010
1 decade ago
Llama
Feb 21st 2010
1 decade ago
If there was a catastrophic failure, people would be demanding their government to assist and rebuild -- sorta like the financial crisis. I'm sure American citizens recognize that the military performs 'exercises' for certain scenarios and we never get to see or witness these. I think it took some pretty big balls to demonstrate what a response to this threat might be.
Just my thoughts.
lee
Feb 21st 2010
1 decade ago
monkeylord
Feb 22nd 2010
1 decade ago
http://www.bipartisanpolicy.org/events/cyber2010
they claim Bi-Partisanship. Not sure I completely believe that, because MOST of the big names were recent Bush Administration folks. Review the source of the information, and I think you might find that while the basis for the exercise might seem to be good, there are probably ulterior motives (it seems we may be getting back to Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt). Although this is CNN, it almost smells of Cheney/Carl Rove and the "GOP is the only ones who can keep the country safe" sort of thing.
EVVJSK
Feb 22nd 2010
1 decade ago